![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
We have mp3 players, in which we carry our music in a software format and can download it as pay-per-track files.
We have ereaders and Kindles, in which we carry our books as a software format and can download them as pay-per-book files.
We have Steam and the PS3, which we can use to download our games as pay-per-game files.
...why in hell are we still buying physical DVDs?
(This, and the guy who first offers me the ability to select the 5 TV channels I actually want for $15 a month is gonna get rich. Just saying.)
We have ereaders and Kindles, in which we carry our books as a software format and can download them as pay-per-book files.
We have Steam and the PS3, which we can use to download our games as pay-per-game files.
...why in hell are we still buying physical DVDs?
(This, and the guy who first offers me the ability to select the 5 TV channels I actually want for $15 a month is gonna get rich. Just saying.)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 09:30 pm (UTC)Give it 2-3 years, and we'll be there. 5 at the outside.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 09:43 pm (UTC)And I agree with you on TV, that's the main reason I don't have it. I'd have to pay the base fee plus one or two add-on packages just to get the five channels I'd actually watch.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 09:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 11:32 pm (UTC)I wonder why nobody's tried to monetize this yet, unlike every other format. That's the actual question here.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:24 am (UTC)And wait--doesn't the iTunes store have TV episodes for sale? ISTR pondering some B5 seasons some time back.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 11:31 pm (UTC)What I'm wondering is more why we've seen this move, for good or ill, in every other format, and yet not movies/TV.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 10:47 pm (UTC)Alas, cable companies will never do this unless they're forced to.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-27 10:56 pm (UTC)Plus, of course, the 56" LCD television crowd isn't going to trade in their Blu-rays for tiny pictures and/or crappy quality.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 03:37 pm (UTC)-->HELLS YES. I desperately want an a la carte cable menu. I'd even take an "X dollars for basic, plus a la carte" arrangement. All I really want are Comedy Central, Cartoon Network, and FoodTV!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:17 pm (UTC)And some of us just like physical copies of things. I'm one of those old-timers (at 27?!) that still buys CDs and vinyl. The day they stop manufacturing CDs is the day I stop listening to new music.
I would really like if there were a la carte TV stations, though. But I've gotten so used to Netflix that when I watch "real" TV I get really angry at the commercials. And it's not like they don't now put out every single show two weeks after the season ends.
(Actually, Netflix does have downloadable content on some of their movies and TV shows. But you have to pay for them.)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:18 pm (UTC)But the bottom's fallen out of the market, and there are countless new/used stores with endless piles of DVDs. Netflix Watch Instantly, On Demand, and Hulu are doing their part to kill the physical format as well.
The big hindrance before was a storage device to support streaming directly to your TV; now people can use their computer, their XBox, or one of Netflix's $100 boxes.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:21 pm (UTC)There's also the broadband penetration question. We big city folks are used to having proper bandwidth wherever we live (and Netflix, Hulu, etc DOES support HD), but that's simply not the case outside major metropolitan areas.
As for a la carte programming -- it'll never happen, at least as anything but a death spiral maneuver. Because if cable companies can make you pay $50 instead of $15 to get what you want, why wouldn't they?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-28 05:26 pm (UTC)HBO is MIA on any service outside of their own OnDemand real estate... partially, again, to reinforce the "prestige of ownership." HBO also charges like 80 friggin' dollars for season sets vs. Showtime's $35 or so. This may've worked back when they were the only real game in town, but I think it's going to bite them in the ass.