The silver lining.
Apr. 16th, 2009 08:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And springing from the previous post like a daisy:
coffeeem: "I think it's time we asked the really important question here:
"Tea bags? Are Americans really so fixated on convenience, so limited in their tastes, that they no longer consume loose tea?
"Or are they afraid the very concept of "looseness" will be too much for impressionable, weak-minded citizens to resist?"
cristalia: "I now want a Loose Tea for Loose Women icon.
"Full of sexy, sexy darjeeling."
I don't have working Photoshop. But I will pay a hefty bounty for this icon.
In blood.
(Or maybe chocolate.)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"Tea bags? Are Americans really so fixated on convenience, so limited in their tastes, that they no longer consume loose tea?
"Or are they afraid the very concept of "looseness" will be too much for impressionable, weak-minded citizens to resist?"
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"Full of sexy, sexy darjeeling."
I don't have working Photoshop. But I will pay a hefty bounty for this icon.
In blood.
(Or maybe chocolate.)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 01:51 am (UTC)I'm sure one of us will, though!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:25 am (UTC)But it is a little surprising how many unhot pictures of tea there are on the internet.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:00 pm (UTC)Usually I'm using the mug THIS BIG.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 09:47 am (UTC)Indeed, that is how I drink tea, by and large.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 11:05 pm (UTC)I will soon have tea-and-promiscuity icons for all occasions. :D
no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:03 am (UTC)If you like them, help yourself (pass along, free for whatever, etc)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 11:10 am (UTC)*STEALS* *...with credit*
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:39 pm (UTC)[um, the cause in this case being praising looseness, not praising right-wing tea parties]
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 10:42 pm (UTC)(You will notice the tea in this icon is loose. But subtly so; just a glimpse.)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 04:58 am (UTC)It's funny how almost the only reason I ever contemplate a paid account - aside from lack of ads, though I started before they were applied to all freebies - is so i can have enough icons to suit my various moods.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 06:08 am (UTC)Teabagging is fine though. *flees*
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 05:04 am (UTC)As it happens, there are a number of bagged teas I rather like (Well, I can be made happy with almost any un-Lipton English Breakfast, and Red Rose is a good catchall tea for a crowd of varied tastes), and oddly, it's the bagged teas, not the loose ones, which have forced me to formulate the theory that the more annoyingly pretentious the packaging, the better the tea within.
But my favourites seem lately to come loose-only.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 10:16 pm (UTC)This is true. I have some ball jasmine from Harney's that's in silk teabags. Silk. I have to use silk teabags in my tea and throw them out and stuff.
It's incredible tea.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 03:58 pm (UTC)but
teabagging = okay?
Silly Americans.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-19 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-19 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-19 04:02 am (UTC)