2009-07-04 07:12 pm

Proof that critiquing, not being critiqued, is what teaches you good writing:

I was just looking over my crit of [livejournal.com profile] matociquala's first draft of "Shoggoths in Bloom", because she wants the draft for her Clarion people and I pack-rat everything, especially electronically. And what's fascinating is, by reading my maybe two pages of comments if you stick them together?

I can tell exactly what I was working to assimilate in my own craft then.

It's paragraph structure. Because all the things I pick up on in that story, all the issues or suggestions I have, all revolve around a paragraph as a unit of ideas and rendering that most efficiently. It's like I practically don't notice a thing if it's not about paragraph structure.

They're not the comments I'd make if I was handed that draft today. Not because I'm too cool for the sentence level or something, but that's just not the thing I inherently notice right now. Given another piece by the same writer -- take "Wind-Up Boogeyman", for example, which is the last thing of Bear's I critted (and also coming out tomorrow on Shadow Unit, by the way): I spent that crit totally harping on questions of narrative closure -- the whole story as a unit of structure, and how themes peak and dip and spiral and then come back to themselves.

Why? Not because what the author's doing that works or doesn't work for me totally changed; it's not about Bear's priorities in narrative. Because that's what I'm trying to learn right now. So when my brain goes trolling for items worth comment in other people's stuff, that's what it red-flags and surrounds with flashing neon lights.

I will never say that being critiqued isn't useful. It shows you the things you have overlooked and suggests the fixes you might not have gotten yourself towards yet. There are several people who, crit-wise, I owe my life. But if I go and look back at other people critting me, I'll see the fingerprints of what they were learning. If I go and look back at what I said to others, this year and last year and the year before -- or now -- I'll see what I myself am learning. I'll see what I learned.
2009-07-04 12:14 am

Writing is like everything else, part #2390-234(b)

Tonight, I am attempting to rewrite a very difficult scene. I am rewriting it because I realized it was structurally/narratively a duplication of something that came before, and didn't serve enough purpose, and made a particular character feel like she doesn't grow or change because of that duplication, which is one of the things that my-agent-I-show-you-her has mentioned in her notes. And then I had to turn around and check what that character's motives were, and then scale back up the whole thing from there.

I think I have the underpinnings now. Sort of. And so now I've disassembled the scene itself and I'm moving words around.

Tonight rewriting feels sort of like having a car engine in pieces. I'm sitting on the floor with my gloves on, with paragraphs and spare parts spread out all around me, and I have to stick them back together, or replace, or rewire just so; so it'll make heat and light again. And it has to weigh the right amount and be the right shape, or it won't fit into the rest of the car.

I have the distinct feeling I'd be having an easier time of this if I knew how to field-strip and reassemble some machinery...

(Back to work.)
2009-06-29 01:33 am

Small, tasteless, and flawed, hoping to see

June 28, 2009 Progress Notes:

Saturnalia

Words today: 500.
Words total: 3500.
Reason for stopping: I've nibbled at this enough to know that I can nibble at it again tomorrow if I want. And it's late.

Munchies: Reggiano, peaches, and about fifteen cups of rooibos chai.

Darling du Jour: Once upon a time Janus lived in the fourteenth-now-seventeenth level and was a child with a child's nightmares about ventilation grates and grubby fingers, locks slipped and babies snatched away in the dark. The monsters down dark were gonna getcha if that room wasn't cleaned right now, mister. Some things never leave you. He brings a lamp.

Things Yet to Cough Up Their Names: Gregory's last name (I think it's Thyrse, but I might change my mind.); some club two levels up.
Mean Things: Nightmares. And regrets.
Research Roundup: What liquor is actually naturally red (it's sloe gin); symbols of Dionysus/Bacchus; related to that, all about fennel.
Books in progress: Michael Chabon, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay.
The glamour: Today was actually singularly glamourless. I was not feeling well, and I spent most of my day reading and revising chapter 3 of Above, not entirely to my satisfaction and under the kind of distraction that only having a Pride stage down the street that's a titch heavy on the bass rattling your windows from 11am to 11pm can give you.

It'll get another pass later on, methinks.


Looks like I was minding my own business, walking down the street, and I just fell on this novel...

Yeah, well. I'm as surprised as you, considering I haven't touched this for almost a year and didn't really have immediate plans to. But apparently the time away and the utter lack of pressure to get it (1) done and (2) done right has combined with (3) taking all that time away from it and realizing the stuck in the prologue was really the stuck of we're writing in stupid circles and not just cutting to the chase. And I still don't have Janus's voice down for that, but eh. It's a draft. I can fix it later. And if I wander off it for another year in a few weeks, it doesn't matter, because it has no deadline, tra la la.

(I should retitle this entry Leah Discovers the True Meaning of Sophomore Album Syndrome. :p But it's a good thing to know. I shall refrain from manufacturing pressure on myself in future on this matter. Because it's a hell of a lot easier to find the words when that's not squatting in the way.)
2009-06-17 09:58 pm

Back on my head, and hopefully back in it too.

First off? Thank you, guys. I feel seriously loved. :)

Tonight is somewhat sleepy in the way that adrenaline comedowns and rainy grey days and life-goes-ons are. I have slopped through the rain after work to pick my new passport up from the post office (thus ensuring they will let me across the border to Readercon), bought groceries, and eaten my dinner, and now I am sitting in my pajamas with a printed copy of my-agent-I-show-you-her's notes on Above, marking them up with bright multicoloured pens to get a sense of exactly how much work, how many organized passes, and how long it shall take me. This is not scary, because I have already revised this book three times, so what's one more? Also, there is really no task that is not facilitated by bright multicoloured pens.

None of this still feels quite real.


I will say I am really tired right now -- work is both busy and somewhat emotionally draining this week -- but I do have a garden post coming, and some other things.
2009-06-16 09:22 pm

Better than blue hair.

Above is a good child, and a dutiful. It calls me on my birthday, wears a jacket when it goes outside, and on its last trip home, it brought a nice literary agent with it.

That is to say, I am pleased dorking out self-satisfied like a cat excited to say that I've accepted an offer of representation from Caitlin Blasdell at Liza Dawson Associates. I am so looking forward to this.

My agent, I show you her!
2009-06-03 10:29 pm

Can you hear my heart beating like a hammer?

This is the theme song of the last six weeks of my life. It plays in my head when I'm walking, and it plays on the radio when I randomly turn it on. It's stalking me around shopping malls, and it is perfectly apropos for everything going on here at the Casa since the end of April.

No end in sight.

It's terrifying. But...kinda wild too, I gotta say. :)


2009-05-01 10:07 pm

Ubiquity is the order of the day.

It's official, Doctor. I have the post-novel ennui.

For the uninitiated, this feels sort of like your brain turning itself inside out, chewing its way through into its empty, empty centre, and then hollering at you like a cat because there's nothing inside it and it's hungry and it wants to play and and and--

And you ask it what it wants to eat or do or be, and it goes "I'unno," and keeps on chasing its own tail around the kitchen floor while hollering at the top of its lungs.

I really don't like this bit.


Not so unrelatedly as it might seem: I know there are a couple People What Know for this question hanging around here.

Are there any good goth clubs left in the city since Savage closed? I need to dance my head quiet, and my living room isn't quite cutting it.
2009-04-29 09:00 pm

Um. So...now what?

No, really. Now what?

*wanders around in circles aimlessly*


Writing Project Honeydew, 2009

Write "Parable of the Shower"
Write "Sugar"
Revise "Parable of the Shower"
Revise "Sugar"
Write two SU DVD extras
Revise Above

Must Do

Write "The Closet Monster"
Start either The Enchanted Generation or Saturnalia


Icing

Start "The Small Dark Movie of Your Life"
Write "The Marriage of the Harpy"
Write "Know Your Apocalypses"
Write "The Right People"
Write "Bachelorette"


I, um. Sort of did most of my work. I may need to put more ambition in my schedule.

So is there anything you guys think I should be doing?
2009-04-19 01:23 am

But the road keeps coming at you, and you find no place to rest...

One of the things I'm liking less about the dayjob beat -- although this isn't entirely the dayjob's fault, but also my overfull plate o' projects -- is that I spend a lot of time very tired or kind of brainburnt. So on the weekend I sleep and sort of let my brain cool, and by the time it's fit for work again it's late Saturday night. Which leaves me one functional day to do any writing: Sunday, between the laundry and groceries and cleaning and what social time there is and so forth and and. And, well. Late Saturday night. Like now.

I think I went through most of a pint of Haagen-Dazs (coffee caramel, thankya), two pots of tea (apple ginger and Stash acai) and five tea lights, but I got some work done tonight.

I need to find a way to balance my life out enough that this, just this, doesn't feel like a monumental accomplishment.
2009-04-13 01:04 am

Five for the road.

1) I went to the AGO today for the first time in...fifteen years? While we did a lot of cracking wise about what is Art and what is Not Art, I realized very starkly how it feels to walk into the short fiction scene without having done the requisite background reading. Art of any kind is a conversation. It's hard to find a good line to get in on, especially when you're seeing snippets and excerpts only.

2) I finally looked up the lyrics to The Slip tonight. It is...a small brilliance of an album. Also, people on lyrics sites are extremely literal readers and think everything has to do with sex and drugs and biographical interpretation, but that's why they won't get a story out of this and I will.

3) When I am rich and famous (or just rich) the first thing I will get is a bathtub that is both long enough and deep enough. Other tall people will know exactly what I mean here.

4) I plan to have no comment on whatever's going down at Amazon until I am in possession of more facts. Not conjecture, not theory, not pattern-matching, not "well so-and-so said they said", but facts. It's only so damn easy to troll the internet because it jumps every time a stick's waved its way, you know. Keep your shoes on, folks.

5) I am actively revising Above again. Yes, I would rather put out my own eyes (with a grapefruit spoon!) than do so. I'm losing that...sense of coherence of the text. But I had a dream two nights ago where [Redacted], Agent of Man's Desiring, sent me a letter at work asking to see the full manuscript, because I'd been talking about it so much and she was interested. And I was so excited I couldn't get a thing done.

I want this. I haven't felt like I want this lately because I have, honestly, been too tired and stressed out to give much of a crap about anything. But I want this, and maybe I needed to be reminded of that.

So I will just have to make that work, won't I?
2009-02-02 07:24 pm

Slapfights, on the theory of.

Y'know, I think I've located the glitch in our metaphor system; the semantic breakdown:

The internet is not a battlefield, upon which a war is fought. Against an enemy. Who requires no-holds-barred force.
The internet is not your house, which needs to be defended. From, again, some implied faceless mob of attackers.
The internet is not a square mile of territory which one can be driven off.
The internet is not a community which one can be ostracised from.
You cannot win the internet.

When you stop looking at it in those terms? You'd be surprised how unnecessary it all becomes.
2009-01-28 11:01 pm

I crack the codes that end the war.

January 28, 2009 Progress Notes:

"Sugar"

Words today: 1000.
Words total: 22,850.
Reason for stopping: Round number. Still writing all the wrong scenes. Like plowing mud. Work tomorrow.

Books in progress: Robert Graves, The Long Week-end; Peter S. Beagle, The Innkeeper's Song.
The glamour: Dayjobbery. Really, that's it. Dayjobbery has been somewhat unexpectedly demanding this week.


Yet 'nother review of "Miles to Isengard" come down the pipe: Anthony Williams at ScienceFictionandFantasy appears to like the atmosphere, but want more explanation.

On the other side of that, I'm sure everyone on this side of the internet knows that Realms of Fantasy has abruptly closed up shop; the website's been taken down inside a day, and the editors found out via the magic of leaked internet discussion. I will not discuss how majorly shitty this is, given that RoF was the home of my first pro sale and filled a solid niche in the market that I don't think anyone else is really replicating. Also, "Mister Oak" is now homeless, and when I am a little more over that, I will have to go find it a new place to live.

My head is also sprouting with short stories, and I do not know what to do with them or where to put them.

Finally, since none of that is especially interesting to Persons Not Me, I give you this, courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] delta_november:



It makes me happy in the way the tea icon makes me happy.

(I need to go thief the tea icon. 'Scuse me.)
2009-01-13 07:22 pm

On Queries

Over the past week, I've received a couple of queries down at the old Ideomancer asking after stories submitted in July, or September, or October. This is currently causing me great grief. I have just detached my head from my desk where it gracefully planted upon reading the last of these missives. Why, you ask?

Because our response time is 30 days.

The problem is not that I can't fathom why on earth a writer would make themself wait six months -- keep a story off the market for six months, wait six times as long as the market says they'll take -- when we've stated we'll be back to you inside 30 days. The problem is that I completely can fathom why.

Obviously I cannot speak for every editor in the yard. Maybe some people are saying "six weeks" and really mean "six months" in their bizarre passive-aggressive code language and will get affronted if you talk to them before six months. I'll say they shouldn't be saying "six weeks" in the first place, then, and ignore them for the purposes of this conversation. But we collectively need to get rid of this notion, boys and girls, that querying is:

a) a ticket to an automatic rejection for daring disturb the editor's slumber;
b) a discouraged practice;
c) combative and bad.

Markets set response time limits for the precise reason that, if it goes past a certain point, they need to hear from you. Queries are part of the system. The second that submission slips into day 31? I, the editor, want to hear from you. I want a query on my desk, because the likeliest thing to have happened (and what happened with the queries I'm getting this week) is that the internet or our spam filter ate your story whole. It never got here. You've been waiting on air, which is a sucky state of affairs. And I cannot fix that for you and read your story (which I want to) and get you a reply (which you want) until you have let me know that story was supposed to be in my inbox in the first place.

That's why you query me.

The reasons for not doing so? They're basically superstition; they're an iteration of that disease that we all get as new writers where we're terrified if we breathe the wrong way, some editor will reject us over some arbitrary set of rules we can't see. This is silly. It doesn't help the writer. It doesn't help the editor.

So please? Query diligently. Query with no fear. Query on day 31 if I say 30 days.

I'm glad we had this talk.
2009-01-12 06:24 pm

Thud: Sugar

January 12, 2009 Progress Notes:

"Sugar"

Words today: 750.
Words total: 15350.
Reason for stopping: Time to go to dance class.

Books in progress: K.J. Parker, Shadow; Robert Graves, The Long Week-end.
The glamour: Did manage to do some finance stuff this afternoon. That was nice.


Really, I have nothing to say about the discontinuation of the Year's Best Fantasy & Horror anthology series but shit. So that is what I'm saying. Shit. This is a blow and a loss, and shit.

Maybe content when I'm back from class.
2008-10-11 07:38 pm

A Boy and His Manuscript

[livejournal.com profile] jmeadows (7:34:59 PM): *destroys bad writing*
[livejournal.com profile] cristalia (7:35:13 PM): *manuscripts worldwide suddenly burst into flame*
[livejournal.com profile] cristalia (7:35:19 PM): *author shock!*
[livejournal.com profile] jmeadows (7:35:23 PM): *spits coffee*
[livejournal.com profile] stillnotbored (7:35:32 PM): *wails of anguish*
[livejournal.com profile] cristalia (7:35:45 PM): *wholesale conflagration in entire bookstore departments*
[livejournal.com profile] stillnotbored (7:36:12 PM): *manga sales skyrocket*
[livejournal.com profile] cristalia (7:36:28 PM): *at least, those that aren't on fire*
[livejournal.com profile] jmeadows (7:36:54 PM): *has THIS MUCH chatloff*
[livejournal.com profile] stillnotbored (7:36:55 PM): *urban fantasy becomes extinct in a day*
[livejournal.com profile] cristalia (7:37:37 PM): *surviving in-print authors wander a postapocalyptic wilderness, shivving each other for tinned food and readership*
[livejournal.com profile] stillnotbored (7:38:07 PM): *agents become warlords, ruling small bands of followers*
[livejournal.com profile] matociquala (7:38:20 PM): So how is this an alternate reality?
2008-09-17 11:38 pm

Plenty

1) I got the job.

2) I got the grant.

2a) [livejournal.com profile] ksumnersmith also got the grant.

2b) The friends let me know I got the grant, having ascertained I hadn't been home or read my mail yet, by asking me out for dessert and springing it on me at the table. It was sort of like:

Karina: Here look!
Leah: Ooh yay you got the grant!
Karina: Read the second page.
Leah: *reads list of grant recipients. Sees own name. Slides down into chair and bursts into tears of shock*
Karina, Jana, and Chris: *laugh long and loud*

At which point we ate chocolate things and drank sangria.

2b) That means we just received grant money from a literary arts body for not one but two genre books. We did that just now. We got acknowledgment and support from the Canlit crowd.

Holy god.


Life is full. Life runneth over. I am still kinda stressed to hell over various things, change and responsibilities and sister's wedding next month, but...

Four literary professionals I don't know read the synopsis and first chapter of my book. And gave it money. Above is now produced with the support of the City of Toronto, through Toronto Arts Council.

Oh my god I'm a real writer.
2008-08-02 11:55 am

Meme Parasitism in the Writing Class

For various reasons, I was thinking this morning on the bus to work about books about writing, and how one of the major splits, for new writers, is between those who will read and use them and those who won't. For those who will read and use them, the argument is: it's a resource, and one from the pros -- why reinvent the wheel? From those who don't read or use them: this will not teach me good writing, it will teach me one person's idea of good writing, and I would prefer to develop my own voice and style.

(Well, there's a whole bunch of less-than-polite stuff about the market and whether it's fresh and bright or decadent and out to get you, but we're stripping off the BS on top to get to the core of the issue.)

With the group that won't read or use them, there's also a certain question of... an almost moral taint? (I will say right now, I don't read or use writing books and never did, so if I say things about this mindset I am also talking about me circa 2002 or so.) That one wants to work through one's own ideas about writing, rather than be sullied with other people's which are clearly worse and will make one's work like everybody else's?

This isn't an uncommon idea about art. It's very big-R Romantic, the artist as essence and wellspring of any valid art product -- and any art product drawn from anything but the artist is just, well, product. People who assign this moral dimension to how art works aren't inherently snobs or something: they've just internalized one of our cultural narratives about art.

I'm not going to argue the right or wrong of this. It's process, nothing more. But here's the thought I had on the bus: avoiding writing books to keep yourself pure of other ideas and then do it all yourself is the equivalent of vaccine parasitism.

Vaccine parasitism's an idea I got wind of from reading [livejournal.com profile] haddayr (here) and [livejournal.com profile] jaylake (here, halfway down). Precis of the issue from Jay's post:

It’s an iteration of the free-rider problem, but basically, anti-vaccination parents are banking on all the parents around their child doing something they would not do to their own child in order to protect their child from communicable diseases.


Y'see, writers who are in these arguments are, by the very ability to have them, interacting with workshop culture. And part of being in a workshop is trading, refining, and hashing out ideas on what makes good writing with the other members. So if one turns up one's nose at books on writing on these artistic-moral grounds, but even one person in your workshop group is reading them, and assimilating those ideas...

Is this Very Artistic choice against writing books -- and the moral haughtiness that often seems to go with it -- really nothing but meme parasitism for writers? Benefiting indirectly from other people's knowledge from a source you wouldn't touch yourself?
2008-07-25 12:00 pm

And further to yesterday, a discussion of business.

Having slept on this, I have decided that exhorting people to talk about business for the team and praising those who do makes me a special kind of douchebag if I sit in my bunker and don't. I, as always, have no desire to be a feminine hygiene product. So today you will be treated to:

The Saga of Why Leah Doesn't Deal With Prime/Wildside Publications

With help from the copious records she keeps

Back in October 2006, when Clarkesworld was a fairly new market paying ten cents a word, I figured I'd give them a try with a story. I waited a little, and then instead of hearing from Nick, got an IM from Sean Wallace (my IM is fairly findable if you look) saying that Nick had passed the story on to him for Fantasy Magazine (which was then a print publication paying 2-5 cents a word. This, I will note, is highly irregular. The ettiquette for passing someone's story to another editor seems to be, well, don't. Recommend the author submit to that editor instead. Or if you do, you ask the author for permission first.

So I was a bit steamed, but Fantasy wanted the story, and I recall having a half-agonized conversation in a coffeeshop before a Waking City event as to whether I should turn down the chance to crack a new market because of my irritation over that ettiquette breach.

Ultimately I decided to take the sale, and woe unto me that I did, because that was the beginning of the Saga.

Skip forward a few months; "Furnace Room Lullaby" is being included in the fifth issue of the magazine, which is coming out pretty quickly, in December 2006. I'm asked for bio and photo information three times (it's lost twice) before I get any sense that it's done. Between these things falls the World Fantasy Convention, at which Sean solicits a novel from me. As I'm working with these guys partially on a "what harm short stories" basis -- knowing personally someone who got screwed hard by Prime on her two collections -- I put him off. Let's see how the short story goes, says me. Throughout this drama, Sean is chasing me for book proposals and IMing me to solicit gossip, occasionally about my personal life.

This makes me uncomfortable, but it is not business and sometimes people are odd in this business. I limit my IM availability to him and mostly shrug it off. A second story is bought by Fantasy, "A Month of Sundays", and one placed with the Japanese Dreams anthology, accepted in a land speed record time that makes me sure to this day it wasn't read the whole way through.

I start getting concerned when reviews of the story, in that issue of the magazine, hit two major review outlets. And I still don't have a contract. I get on the horn, and Sean is sending out contracts and payments; the issue is already out. I make my discomfort with the publishing without a contract known, even though the discomfort is now outright anger. Sean is very sad that he has screwed up, but does not in future take steps to correct this.

I get the contract the first week of February (the magazine came out end of December/beginning of January).

It's a really, really bad contract.

The rights in the contract do not match the rights advertised at that time on Fantasy Magazine's public guidelines. That approaches fraud. They want all rights, all languages, for two cents a word. There is no reversion date. There is no statement of legal jurisdiction, which is a standard feature of any contract anywhere. For those not familiar with short fiction contracts, this is highly nonstandard and borders on abusive. I get on the horn to Sean (this will happen a lot). He says it's all Betancourt's fault and enacts IM spy drama so Betancourt won't see him typing. I drop the f-word (fraud).

I revise the contract to standard specs, and send it back.

Time passes. And passes. Seven weeks, in fact.

And I'm e-mailing and IMing, and I'm bugging, and I can't seem to get a copy of the countersigned contracts back to make this an actual official legal agreement. Sean, who was more than happy to talk to me before to the point of calling me "dear", which is really professionally inappropriate considering we are not friends, is now avoiding me.

I am now very upset, and very afraid that given all the fast ones they've tried to pull above, and given all the horror stories I heard from authors I know, like, and respect when I "came out" as someone who was having contract and payment trouble with Prime/Wildside, that I'm never going to get those countersigned documents and they're gonna pull a fast one regarding rights somewhere quiet, where I can't see it or do anything about it until too late.

So I pull the other two stories and get on the horn to Griefcom.


Griefcom are fast-moving and lovely people. My countersigned contracts are wrenched out of the publisher's hands. I am assured that things are going to get dealt with by several people at Prime/Wildside in the wake of my pulling the stories and telling people at that company (other ones) why. Many promises are made.

I, however, have had enough, and do not go back.

At my last intelligence, which is a few months back, that contract was still being used. Fantasy Magazine's submission guidelines still advertise a purchase of First North American Serial Rights, despite that being impossible as they are now a web publication. The near-fraudulent issue of claiming one rights buy and substituting another in contract has not been addressed, and it has been over a year and a half since this all went down.

Sean still occasionally IMs me until I block him, shortly after the contracts are back in my hand.

That was my experience with Prime Books/Wildside Press publications.

I still have a reprint pending there, in Best New Fantasy 2, but that anthology has been delayed for a year and a half as well, and I expect it will never see print. Sean guaranteed me and one other contributor this past weekend that it was going to proofs this summer. We will see.


In sum: I don't know if the Prime/Wildside business model runs on, to be perfectly blunt, malice or incompetence. But as concerns my personal business, I don't care anymore. This was beyond the pale of what I've ever seen in a short fiction market, and it is not in my business plan to touch hot stoves twice.

Your take-home lessons:

1) This only got as far as it did because I did stupid things. I cannot emphasize this enough. My gut was giving me warnings about this person's attempt to assume friendship, to get in my personal space in order to get things from me, about the delays and avoidance and sketchy practices that could have been just a one-time oopsie, and I disregarded them. Never do that. Listen to your belly. It knows about publishing.

2) Do not conduct business in IM. Take any business conducted in IM to e-mail, which has a timestamped and traceable record.

3) And for that matter, keep all your business correspondence. You may need to make a case to Griefcom one day.


I no longer deal with any Prime/Wildside publication, have turned down their solicitation of a novel, and do not advise those who solicit my opinion to touch this publisher with a ten-foot pole.

As always, my experience is mine, and your business is yours, and I am not telling you what to do. But I hope this is a useful datapoint for those of you considering doing business with this publisher, or any publisher. Tell your children not to do what I have done. You'll save yourself a lot of grief, and you don't really want to be in the exclusive club of people, who as Cisco put it, got Primed.
2008-07-24 06:09 pm

Discussions of Business. Why We Should Have Them.

Author Michael Cisco discusses his experience of Prime Books's business practices.

ETA: And [livejournal.com profile] benpeek adds his own experiences, as do [livejournal.com profile] wirewalking here and [livejournal.com profile] eiriene here. [livejournal.com profile] zhai generally comments, as does [livejournal.com profile] matociquala.

I have two things to say about this. Okay, I have more than two things, but I have two things I will say in public at this juncture:

1) I admire Cisco's willingness to pay it forward to the rest of the community here. Yes, I view this as an act of pay-forward. By describing his experiences with a publisher that gears its acquisitions towards newer authors, he's giving the rest of the group useful datapoints upon which to draw if they ever have to decide about doing business with Prime Books.

And if someone else's experience was different than his, maybe they will come in and expound on their experience with that market. That way, we get a discourse and a sense of how various markets work and whether we want to work with them, or which markets go on our wishlist of definitely want to publish there. We can make informed decisions, and the more informed and transparent the decision-making of this industry is, the better and healthier it will be.


2) Pursuant to that, the response to Cisco's post seems to be composed mostly of Awkward Silence. People are uncomfortably looking elsewhere as an author talks about his relationship with his publisher in public. It's very Canadian, actually: maybe if we look away from the crazy man he will stop talking to the aliens.

Guys, this isn't a marriage. We don't sleep with our publishers; it isn't TMI, and nobody's pants are down in public while they're raving drunkenly at the fiftieth family reunion. What this is? An author talking about his business associate, and discussing his business associate's business activities with an eye to informing other people in his industry of their practices. Also, I think (although I might be reading in) with an eye to improving the practices of that industry. So it doesn't happen again.

There is nothing wrong with that.

If Cisco's experience is atypical, that will come out in the wash. If it is typical, that too will come out in the wash, and if that is so, then it's not because some bad author spoke up about things he wasn't supposed to, but because a publisher was doing it wrong. If the publisher is doing it wrong? You need to talk about that. Because that's your books, your money, and your work that will be put at risk when it's your turn in the barrel.

We need to get over this sense of social awkwardness, of secrecy. Pronto. We need to stop treating publishing relationships like they deserve the holy secrecy of 1950s marriages.

Take care of yourselves, and of each other.

Talk about your business.
2008-07-10 07:14 pm

The Importance of Saying No

There is this thing I do. There is a list of markets I will not work with.

I have not made large flailing noises on the internet saying so, or sent them snippy letters so they know how much I'm too cool for them or some like bullshit. Because this isn't about exercising power over someone, or being too cool. It's about what directions I want to take my business, the business of writing, in which I as CEO must decide with which other businesses to associate my name.

Here is why I am talking about this today. Take a break. Read the link.

I am not the arbiter and validator of other people's business decisions. Their businesses are not mine, and I am not placing judgment on the authors who work with Helix and are protesting people's responses to its editor's behaviour in that post and its comments. Helix, however, is one of the markets that I will not work with. That initial decision was not made entirely because of its editor's propensity for spouting off at the mouth in a racist and sexist fashion, but that was at least half of it. I don't want my name associated with Helix or William Sanders.

In that linked post and its comments, you have some pretty good authors who are now in a bad position: they're forced not to defend, but to not entirely condemn the bad behaviour of someone to whom they owe a professional obligation. I don't believe that any of those authors agree with this editor's attitudes regarding women and Muslims or find those attitudes acceptable. But their names are tied in now with Helix and William Sanders, and there is only so much they can do.

What you are seeing in [livejournal.com profile] nojojojo's post is called damage control. And fairly gracefully done. But learn from it, all ye readers: when Nora says "But don't tar and feather the authors in Helix just because of their association with him. That's just not right." it may well not be right.

But it's gonna happen nonetheless.


I'm bringing this up to point out one of the more important things I've learned about publishing:

Selling fiction, at whatever cost? To markets with sketchy reputations, or whose editors and publishers behave in sketchy ways?

Not worth it.

Publishing should be fun. Yes, it's a business pursuit, but it should leave a warm glow in your tummy. You should be able to look back in a few months or years at that publication and go "yes, that was a positive experience for me and the other guy too".

It should not be damage control.

Do business with people who will deal fairly with you and conduct themselves in good faith, who demonstrate an understanding of the social mores of the genre community and the standards of professionalism. Do business with people who give you contracts you actually want to sign, without that little qualm in your belly at 2am.

It is perfectly permissible to look at the behaviour of a market, or its proponents, and say to yourself "I will not submit my work there".

Yes, this is sometimes hard, especially if you're just starting out and have zero to a few sales to your name. They have something you want. And when you want a thing very badly, it is hard to cut people out of the herd who may be able to give it to you. But think about how you want it, too, and how you want to feel about it when you look back in ten years.

So set a standard for yourself. Apply it rigorously. And when someone does not meet it, even if they have an offer in hand?

Say thanks, but no thanks.

Because you don't want to be in that shitty situation. And because it'll make you a lot happier, as you chase down the path towards making your business a career.