Proof that critiquing, not being critiqued, is what teaches you good writing:
I was just looking over my crit of
matociquala's first draft of "Shoggoths in Bloom", because she wants the draft for her Clarion people and I pack-rat everything, especially electronically. And what's fascinating is, by reading my maybe two pages of comments if you stick them together?
I can tell exactly what I was working to assimilate in my own craft then.
It's paragraph structure. Because all the things I pick up on in that story, all the issues or suggestions I have, all revolve around a paragraph as a unit of ideas and rendering that most efficiently. It's like I practically don't notice a thing if it's not about paragraph structure.
They're not the comments I'd make if I was handed that draft today. Not because I'm too cool for the sentence level or something, but that's just not the thing I inherently notice right now. Given another piece by the same writer -- take "Wind-Up Boogeyman", for example, which is the last thing of Bear's I critted (and also coming out tomorrow on Shadow Unit, by the way): I spent that crit totally harping on questions of narrative closure -- the whole story as a unit of structure, and how themes peak and dip and spiral and then come back to themselves.
Why? Not because what the author's doing that works or doesn't work for me totally changed; it's not about Bear's priorities in narrative. Because that's what I'm trying to learn right now. So when my brain goes trolling for items worth comment in other people's stuff, that's what it red-flags and surrounds with flashing neon lights.
I will never say that being critiqued isn't useful. It shows you the things you have overlooked and suggests the fixes you might not have gotten yourself towards yet. There are several people who, crit-wise, I owe my life. But if I go and look back at other people critting me, I'll see the fingerprints of what they were learning. If I go and look back at what I said to others, this year and last year and the year before -- or now -- I'll see what I myself am learning. I'll see what I learned.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I can tell exactly what I was working to assimilate in my own craft then.
It's paragraph structure. Because all the things I pick up on in that story, all the issues or suggestions I have, all revolve around a paragraph as a unit of ideas and rendering that most efficiently. It's like I practically don't notice a thing if it's not about paragraph structure.
They're not the comments I'd make if I was handed that draft today. Not because I'm too cool for the sentence level or something, but that's just not the thing I inherently notice right now. Given another piece by the same writer -- take "Wind-Up Boogeyman", for example, which is the last thing of Bear's I critted (and also coming out tomorrow on Shadow Unit, by the way): I spent that crit totally harping on questions of narrative closure -- the whole story as a unit of structure, and how themes peak and dip and spiral and then come back to themselves.
Why? Not because what the author's doing that works or doesn't work for me totally changed; it's not about Bear's priorities in narrative. Because that's what I'm trying to learn right now. So when my brain goes trolling for items worth comment in other people's stuff, that's what it red-flags and surrounds with flashing neon lights.
I will never say that being critiqued isn't useful. It shows you the things you have overlooked and suggests the fixes you might not have gotten yourself towards yet. There are several people who, crit-wise, I owe my life. But if I go and look back at other people critting me, I'll see the fingerprints of what they were learning. If I go and look back at what I said to others, this year and last year and the year before -- or now -- I'll see what I myself am learning. I'll see what I learned.