Hee. The edition we're using is the Norton one edited by Teskey. It's pretty well footnoted, doesn't have any weird stuff in it. My old edition, which I replaced with this one, has some hilariously old-school early century British snark in it about who was the best poet SMACKDOWN and just...a really not-relativist view of literary merit that is both appallingly arrogant and makes me laugh out loud in public places. But is not as well footnoted.
no subject